When was the schooner flight written

Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.

Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. Institutional Login. The flight passes by the remains of old ships whose sails have been worn dry by age. On these ships he sees the flesh, tissues, and bones of half-naked crewmen. He sees the great admirals of the past—Rodney, de Grasse, Nelson— and hears their orders to their seamen. In his encounter, Shabine imbues these still remains with life as only a poet could, in order to experience history in a more personal and immediate fashion, and also to share in the stories of men like him before him.

Moving on from the war ships, the flight encounters slave ships. We see, then, that the previous imaginative experience was deeply personal for Shabine, inaccessible to others around him.

As such, he shares whether by choice, or by the dictates of his society in the history of the European forebears of the Caribbean, never mind that they fail to recognize him along with the darker skinned West Indians as an heir.

In stark contrast to the meeting of the war ships, the moment of contact between the men on the schooner and the slave ships is far less tactile.

There is no physicality to the slaves; Shabine cannot see them. So deep have the histories of the black forebears of the Caribbean been buried that even Shabine, with his poetic ability, is unable to give form to them. Shabine, and the others around him, thus, recognize an undeniable connection, seek vehemently by clamorously shouting proof of this connection, but are forced to abandon their search.

We come to understand the unfortunate situation of the West Indian, doubly removed from an understanding of his African ancestry both by the deliberate de-historicization wrought upon him by slavery and colonialism, and by the fact of his inhabiting new natural locations whose Edenic quality and remoteness from the African continent blind him from the truth and proof of his ancestry. How can we identify ourselves with a name that situates us firmly in one tradition?

The same brief encounter with the slave ships, which raises the above questions, subtly hints at their answers, too. They recognize an ancestral connection with these slaves of all nations, even without seeing them.

When Shabine asks grandfather History in his cream linen for answers about the black cook, History responds with nothing. In turn, Shabine accepts this shared nothingness with other Caribbean men like himself, other in-between men, as the basis for a shared identity.

The lack of a coherent, fully tangible history unites them, and on this they base and construct a new tradition for themselves and their children to come. The answers to the above questions, however, still elude Shabine. The pain and turmoil, caused by his search for an identity and for a coherent sense of self, whirl to a head and increasingly threaten to sunder Shabine permanently into the nothingness from which he desperately seeks to escape.

So profound is this pain that Shabine begins to descend into madness. Feeling himself sinking amidst the tempest of contradictory historical forces within him, Shabine makes an impassioned plea for salvation from the pain and horror of society and history that refuse to acknowledge him.

And Shabine, in his search for identity in a particular framework of tradition , seeks to situate himself in a fixed place, a rest place within the expanse of history. History keeps silent, and he is unable to unearth the story about himself. There is, of course, no simple answer to this question, not least because of the range of registers to be found in each Caribbean country. Nevertheless one can venture a few generalizations. Baugh n. In an often-rehearsed oppositional pairing cf.

Both representations are reductive, since they fail to tease out the extent to which the verse of both writers creolizes their supposed points of origin. Ultimately both locate themselves first and foremost within the Caribbean, transforming their intertexts.

Nourbese Philip and Dionne Brand, who have migrated northwards in the Americas, have engaged with the task of developing a poetics for Caribbean women. Each engages in the Oedipal struggle that commentators as different from one another as Harold Bloom and Roland Barthes have seen as central to the love-hatred relationship that writers have with their precursors. If there is no longer a Father, why tell stories?

Barthes , In one of the most famous aphorisms on the issue of influence, T. Walcott offers a striking variation on this in a passage that seems to echo it in Another Life: I had entered the house of literature as a houseboy, filched as the slum child stole, as the young slave appropriated those heirlooms temptingly left with the Victorian homilies of Noli tangere.

Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang. Baugh, Edward n. Kingston: Savacou Publications. Brathwaite, Edward Kamau : The Arrivants. When Shabine asks for history, nothing is there, but his lyric voice is able to generate narrative out of that nothing: the fathers are unseen and silent, but everything around them indicates their presence, "too deep" to see or hear.

This deep, oceanic place looks much like the one Shabine will claim and occupy, not silently, at the end of the poem. He succeeds not in learning the name of his grandfather, but in envisioning a history which does not require names to figure paternity. Yet the satisfying vision tells its own tale: the silence here, of sons falling silent because the silent fathers cannot hear them, is not utterly unlike History's earlier silence, and Shabine's desire for recognition, for information , comes no closer to being satisfied by his spectacular vision.

Rather than being answered, his question is rewritten as a rhetorical one: "Who knows who his grandfather is, much less his name? Thus, even history's bastard children acquire a story, albeit a story about silence and namelessness. Walcott stakes a claim for the power of lyric to repeal the passage of time, and permit construction of a past in shapes we can live with and understand—in other words, poetry's power to reproduce history as myth.

These middle sections of the poem make the claim good, though not innocently. In the section which follows "The Sailor Sings Back to the Casuarinas" , a melancholy and cultivated voice laments that history, particularly colonial history, can never be evacuated from poetry, which will always be haunted by "the pain of history words contain" Even the casuarinas bend with grief in the wind, mourning another of the drowned sailors who in this poem seem to mark history's killing power; the power of images to console is never total.

Shabine, too, is not quite done with the past. At the climax of the storm which takes up the poem's penultimate section, "Out of the Depths," the ghost ships of "The Middle Passage" return: not as signs of a buried ancestry but as harbingers of death. When peace comes after this storm, it comes not only to air and water but to virtually all the storms the poem has evoked; rage and desire ebb.

One looks to this passage, then, for resolution of a great deal, and it seems particularly pressing to understand the work it does, and how that work gets done. Lord, hear my voice! Let thy ears be attentive to the voice of my supplications" Ps.

What follows as implicit answer seems to point repeatedly to the story of Jonah suggested earlier by Maria Concepcion's prophetic dream of "whales and a storm" : a story about how one may be swallowed up by the sea's maw and yet survive.

Or, one might say after reading the Gospels, a version of the resurrection adapted for sailors and reluctant prophets. Ghost ships and drowned sailors may sink, then, but Shabine is not bound to share their fate. The strength which "seizes" Shabine suggests a second allusion to Matthew , one where drowning figures a lack of faith:.

Finding this faith, Shabine also finds the place in which it originated. Rather, he finds a belief that he may live, and that belief that living may be possible makes it possible. In his recognition of that faith as coming from a community, he finds a history which locates and makes sense of this moment, both in terms of his personal past and in terms of a shared, communal narrative.

At the same time, "Out of the Depths" has its incoherences when taken with the rest of the poem. The poem anticipates and subsequently claims the second; yet the passage, in some measure, suggests the first.

It is not clear, though, that Shabine is a mythic figure in quite that way, removed from time and contingency; to the extent that this is still a poem about the imaginative coming to terms with history, the profusion of antecedent texts also signals a resurgence of the past's pressure. This backward turn, moreover, embraces an unreformed past, a childhood faith of fear, pride, and despair as well as survival. If the crisis of the poem in "Out of the Depths" undoes the earlier work of leaving the past behind, its conclusion, "After the Storm," is less than firmly committed to the communal context the previous section has reconstituted; arguably, its undeniable lyric power comes with the move away from that context.

The final stretch of the poem is strangely depopulated. It begins with the end of desire, as Shabine sees "the veiled face of Maria Concepcion marrying the ocean, then drifting away… I wanted nothing after that day. Though Shabine is still aboard the Flight , no one else appears with him. Each of these two great antecedent poems ends with an ironizing disclaimer. Walcott's turn towards the third person, by contrast, does not seem to disavow the poem which precedes it; the song is claimed by or for the speaker, as well as the power to inhabit the deep place it comes from Prufrock's "chambers of the sea" and to own it as a native place.

In that sense, this poem attempts to trump Milton and Eliot both; it also deironizes them, asserting that drowned sailors may survive, that one may sing from beneath the sea, that a poem may be written without being framed and disavowed by the authorial voice.

If as a living voice Shabine sings "from the depths of the sea," it can no longer be said that he has everything in common with other islanders. In "After the Storm" Terada sees Shabine pulling "his perspective as far back as it can go," to a "nearly posthumous distance" It is from that distance that Shabine speaks his blessing on the islands left behind, a distance from which those islands, if "all different size," begin to share generic features, even to look alike.